Indian journal of Medical Biochemistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Cost Analysis in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory in the Era of Automation: Our Experience

Bhasker Mukherjee, Kanchan Kulhari, Deepti Sahran, Kapil Bhatia

Keywords : Clinical chemistry, Cost per reproducible test, Cost per test, Dry chemistry analyzer, Wet chemistry analyzer

Citation Information : Mukherjee B, Kulhari K, Sahran D, Bhatia K. Cost Analysis in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory in the Era of Automation: Our Experience. Indian J Med Biochem 2019; 23 (2):236-241.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10054-0094

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: In the era of automation, the modalities available for analysis of samples for a clinical chemistry laboratory include both wet chemistry and dry chemistry analyzers. Wet chemistry systems are routinely used in small to large clinical chemistry laboratories whereas dry chemistry analyzers are restricted to large laboratories. Cost analysis is a system that is used for providing financial information to make financial projections. Aim of the study was to compare the cost analysis of wet chemistry and a dry chemistry analyzer. Materials and methods: Apart from the cost of the basic kits, a large number of controls, calibrators, consumables, and fluids are procured to run the various tests in the laboratories. A cost analysis of the wet chemistry analyzer and the dry chemistry analyzer available with us was performed to compare both the systems. Results: The cost per test (CPT) of the parameters on the wet chemistry analyzer was lower as compared to the dry chemistry analyzer. On factoring the cost of controls, calibrators, tubings, accessories and other consumables for both the systems, a figure of ₹ 8.91 as the cost of consumables per test for the wet chemistry analyzers and ₹ 0.40 for the dry chemistry analyzer was reached. On the further calculation of the cost per reproducible test (CPRT), it was seen that the wet chemistry analyzer had CPRT of ₹ 26.43 and the dry chemistry analyzer had ₹ 23.5. Conclusion: The results point towards the dry chemistry analyzer as being cheaper to a wet chemistry analyzer if the workload of samples being analyzed on them is high. Clinical importance: A thorough cost analysis is imperative to be done for any clinical chemistry laboratory to determine the cost-effectiveness of a system so that an informed decision can be made to incorporate new methods if required.


PDF Share
  1. Fantus JE. Business strategies for hospital outreach programs. Clin Lab Manage Rev 1999;13:188-196.
  2. Tantanate C, Charuruks N. Cost Analysis in Clinical Laboratory in Thailand. Siriraj Med J. 2007; 59:35-39
  3. Harmening DM. Fundamental of financial management In Laboratory management: principles and processes. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2003:163-179.
  4. World Health Organisation (WHO). Analysis of hospital costs: Manual for managers.1998. Geneva; WHO: 1998.
  5. Henry JB, Kurec AS. The clinical laboratory: organization, purposes, and practice. In: Henry JB, ed. Clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 20th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. 2001:3-49.
  6. Hardwick DF, Morrison JI, Tydeman J, Cassidy PA, Chase WH. Laboratory costs and utilization: a framework for analysis and policy design. J Med Educ. 1981;56:307-315.
  7. Leese B, Hutton J. Desk top analysers in general medical practice: how useful are they? Med Lab Sci. 1990 Oct;47(4):256-262.
  8. Tarbit IF. Costing clinical biochemistry services as part of an operational management budgeting system. J Clin Pathol 1986;39:817-827.
  9. Tarbit IF. Laboratory costing system based on number and type of test: its association with the Welcan workload measurement system. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:92-97.
  10. Morrison IJ, Tydeman J, Cassidy PA, Hardwick DF, Davies CT. Cost of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Tests. Lab Med. 1983 Sep;14(9): 567-570.
  11. Carpenter RB. Laboratory cost analysis: a practical approach. Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1990 May-Jun;4(3):168-177.
  12. Butros FA. The manager’s financial handbook. Cost concepts and breakeven analysis. Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(4):243-249.
  13. Veeranuwat P, Thongsripong U, Pangkanon P, Theerakup P. Costs in clinical chemistry laboratory at Vajira Hospital during the year 1977 to 1981. Thai Med Counc Bull 1986;15:55-60.
  14. Shutinun P, Aiumsakul V. Determining costs in clinical chemistry laboratory. Thai Med Counc Bull 1988; 17:455-459.
  15. Chotiwan P, Hempisut P, Kamonratanakul P, Dhanaman B, Tungcharoensathien V, Hiransuthikul N et al. Unit costs of laboratory tests at the outpatient department of Chulalongkorn Hospital. Chula Med J. 1996; 40: 801-813.
  16. Gujral S, Dongre K, Bhindare S, Subramanian PG, Narayan H, Mahajan A et al. Activity-based costing methodology as tool for costing in hematopathology laboratory. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010 Jan-Mar;53(1):68-74.
  17. Fukuda H, Imanaka Y. Assessment of transparency of cost estimates in economic evaluations of patient safety programmes. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):451-459.
  18. Clement Nee Shrive FM, Ghali WA, Donaldson C, Manns BJ.The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches. Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):377-388.
  19. Page K1, Graves N, Halton K, Barnett AG. Humans, ‘things’ and space: costing hospital infection control interventions. J Hosp Infect. 2013 Jul;84(3):200-205.
  20. Kapadia MP, Soni HD, Modi KR, Patel SM, Tailor PB. Cost analysis of clinical chemistry examinations at government run tertiary care center. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research 2015; 6(06):495-498.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.