Implementation and Evaluation of Self-directed Learning Activity in Biochemistry for Phase I MBBS Students
Sushma B Jagannatha, Sumit Parashar
Keywords :
Lecture, Pretest scores, Posttest score, Questionnaire and phase I MBBS students, Self-directed learning
Citation Information :
Jagannatha SB, Parashar S. Implementation and Evaluation of Self-directed Learning Activity in Biochemistry for Phase I MBBS Students. Indian J Med Biochem 2025; 29 (1):8-12.
Aim and background: The teaching strategy, self-directed learning (SDL), is a very important and effective method used for teaching and learning that enables medical students for lifelong learning, enabling them to fulfill their learning requirements in self-directing way, identify ideal learning resources, identify objectives ideal for learning, and also assess the process involved in learning all through their career. The objectives of the present study were to compare the effectiveness of SDL alone and SDL blended with lecture and to study the perceptions of students about SDL as a TL method.
Methodology: A prospective observational study was conducted involving a total of 180 phase I MBBS students who gave voluntary consent for the study. Study protocol consisted of two sessions: Session 1: SDL alone, and Session 2: Lecture following SDL. A baseline pretest was conducted, and posttest was conducted after the completion of both sessions using a validated multiple-choice questionnaire, and students’ perception forms were analyzed.
Results: There was a statistically significant increase in posttest scores compared to the baseline pretest scores, and further, there was a statistically significant increase in posttest scores of lectures following SDL sessions compared to posttest scores of an SDL session.
Conclusion: Overall performance of the students was improved when a topic was taken as SDL followed by didactic lecture, which has been indicative of an improvement in learning outcomes when adopting the SDL module. Our study strongly recommends a sensible combination of SDL and lecture, rather than implementation of SDL alone, for phase one MBBS students.
Clinical significance: Blended learning SDL combined with lecture has better outcomes as it enables the students to clinically correlate the topic learned in biochemistry.
Agrawal P, Verma N. Implementation of a self-directed learning module for undergraduate medical students in biochemistry: Sharing of an experience. Int J Adv Med 2020;7(2):361–362. DOI: 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20200094.
Knowles MS. Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Illinois, USA: Follett Publishing; 1975.
Mezirow J. A critical theory of self-directed learning. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 1985;1985(25):17–30.
Medical Council of India (MCI). Competency-Based Undergraduate Curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. New Delhi, India: Medical Council of India (MCI); 2018.
Agrawal P, Verma N. Pre discussion and post discussion assessment scores in a self-directed learning module implemented in the department of biochemistry: A comparative study. Indian J Med Spec 2020;11(2):1–4. DOI: 10.4103/INJMS.INJMS_153_19.
Bobby Z, Koner BC, Sridhar MG, et al. Formulation of questions followed by small group discussion as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2007;35(1):45–48. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.3.
Nepal I. Readiness for self-directed learning among first semester students of a medical school in Nepal. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2011;5(1):20–23. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1130.
Bradley P, Oterholt C, Herrin J, et al. Comparison of directed and self-directed learning in evidence-based medicine: A randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 2005;39(10):1027–1035. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02268.x.
Badyal DK, Lata H, Sharma M, et al. Triple Cs of self-directed learning: Concept, conduct, and curriculum placement. CHRISMED J Health Res 2020;7(4):235. DOI: 10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_13_21.
Pai KM, Rao KR, Punja D, et al. The effectiveness of self-directed learning (SDL) for teaching physiology to first-year medical students. Australas Med J 2014;7(11):448–453. DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.2211.
Grow GO. Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Educ Q 2016;41(3):125–149. DOI: 10.1177/0001848191041003001.
Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan LC, et al. Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: How culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ 2012;46(8):738–747. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04290.x.
Kidane HH, Roebertsen H, van der Vleuten CPM. Students’ perceptions towards self-directed learning in Ethiopian medical schools with new innovative curriculum: A mixed-method study. BMC Med Educ 2020;20(1):7. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1924-0.
Thota S, Nimmanapalli HD, Bitla AR. Implementation and evaluation of self-directed learning activity in biochemistry for first-year MBBS students. J Med Edu 2022;21(1):e126957. DOI: 10.5812/jme-126957.
Shamsuddin F, Ilias LM, Sreedharan S. A comparison of didactic lectures to self-directed learning in medical education. J Evid Based Med 2017;4(3):110–114. DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2017/22.
Marcos P, Arroyo-Jiménez MM, Artacho-Perula E, et al. Self-directed learning in the Gross Anatomy medical curriculum. Eur J Anat 2004;8(3):147–153.
Lee YM, Mann KV, Frank BW. What drives students’ self-directed learning in a hybrid PBL curriculum. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010;15(3):425–437. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-009-9210-2.